Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 14:30:50 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2004 at 17:06:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 20, 2004 at 15:39:11, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On May 20, 2004 at 15:14:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>Then the question becomes "Is there any other alternative way to enter?" and if >>>the answer is yes, then "do I really want to do that?" But I would not call >>>myself "banned". Banned means absolutely forbidden entry. I would say "I was >>>greatly hindered or discouraged from entering." >> >>Suppose you are arrested and bail is set at $10000000000000. >> >>Is that not the same as refusing you to make bail? >> >>-S. > > >Technically, no. Practically, yes. As I said I see _both_ sides of the >argument... > >But we should use the right term... I don't really think splitting hairs over the term is important, what is important is that they prevented Junior from playing. Whether they did that by banning, shooting the author, demading obscene amounts of money or not giving him an invite for a visa all pretty much leads to the same result. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.