Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 19:40:05 05/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2004 at 22:24:08, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 19, 2004 at 12:18:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 19, 2004 at 10:29:28, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On May 18, 2004 at 14:07:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On May 18, 2004 at 13:52:29, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 18, 2004 at 13:25:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 18, 2004 at 12:34:31, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 18, 2004 at 11:44:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Yes, you can't afford to leave USA 1 day, but you can afford $15k+ machines >>>>>>>always. >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't own a single 15K machine, period. I own one sony laptop, one gateway PC >>>>>>in my home. >>>>>> >>>>>>And you talk about "selective math". In your case it is "non-math" as every >>>>>>number you puke up is utter nonsense. >>>>> >>>>>So you deny that you wrote speedup = 8.81 in your thesis >>>>>and that you wrote in your DTS article speedup = 11.1 >>>> >>>>Please quote where I denied that. I didn't deny _either_ result... >>> >>>8.81 != 11.1 >>> >>>and your 11.1 results are based upon data which can be proven as a big fraud. >> >> >>First, 8.81 came from BK at 5 plies. 11.1 came from a set of game positions at >>10 plies. 8.81 carried nothing from position to position. 11.1 carried > >Your 11.1 comes from nowhere. You invented it yourself. Based upon self invented >speedup numbers you calculated then search time. This is trivial to proof and >has been proven in 2002 august. Okay. If it is so trivial -- please "re-prove" it. I missed this August 2002 discussion of proof. I would, however, be interested in seeing the proof (rather than more threads of rants, raves, and name calling...) -elc. <snipped>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.