Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 11:51:27 12/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 1998 at 14:01:28, Mike Saavedra wrote: >On December 18, 1998 at 03:20:13, Micheal Cummings wrote: > > >> >>It is just sad that you (KK) do not seem to realise that what you say is offensive, I >>see you a nominated on the moderator list. hmmmm, not on my list anymore. > >Michael, I still don't understand WHY it's offensive. Does it offend you? Why? >CM6000 doesn't care, its an inanimate object. KK hasn't insulted anyone or used >vulgarity. He just expressed his opinion on this program. He's entitled to that. >You are entitled to disagree his assessment and challenge it. It creates lively >debate. Nonetheless, if consider someone's statements offensive, perhaps you can >explain to whom he is being offensive, since you can only offend a human being. As you Know I am sure and many others here that several heated descussions about cm6000 Have taken place over this type of "talk" K K also says the title was meant to get peoples attention,Now why do you suppose he would figure this would get peoples attention Hmmm... Not much thought needs to go in this ,dont you agree? He has not ever started out a review like this another small proof of the statement,He is a very smart chess reviewer for sure and when a product gets reviewed it is stating good points bad points and then if this gets fixed then it will be a great product so on and so on.So of course it was another negative shot at cm6000 and for K K to to phrase it like this to stir a response (and it is what he did he states it by saying he wanted to get peoples attention) I do not like because if you know a product is good and there saying its not then it will be offending just like with fritz5 a lot of people were defending it like it was their child as a matter of fact alot who now are saying why are you cm6000 fans getting so upset. I am prepared to bring up a bunch of chess positions in which the "favorite" chess engines cant solve and cm6000 can and there are alot!! then I am going to say what is the point of the analysis feature in program A if the engine isnt strong enough to get it RIGHT! Hmmm.. I wonder what the response will be?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.