Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:52:07 05/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 2004 at 16:07:55, Peter Berger wrote: >On May 23, 2004 at 11:49:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 23, 2004 at 11:46:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On May 23, 2004 at 11:22:20, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>On May 23, 2004 at 11:04:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>Something I didn't think about is that any idiot, including Vincent, can look at >>>>>the CCT6 opteron log files at ftp.cis.uab.edu/pub/hyatt/cct6.log to see exactly >>>>>what "opening book" I used. I had "show book" turned on so everything is there >>>>>to refute this VD nonsense. Since I won't re-use already played opening lines, >>>>>revealing them is not a big deal. >>>> >>>>Interesting ones. What made you change from 1. d4 to 1. e4 in the final round >>>>against Hiarcs?` >>>> >>>>Also I think if Hiarcs had "known" what Crafty was up to it would have played 3. >>>>...Bc5 in this game ;) >>> >>> >>>I wanted to play for a win, to avoid the tie-break scenario we ended up in. >>> >>>:) >>> >>>The opening I had chosen is a pretty good one for white, if white has a hardware >>>advantage. :) >>> >>> >>>Had it played Bc5 chances would have been very good there would have been no >>>playoff too. :) >> >> >>Don't forget, I "stole" all of this from Shredder. Didn't do any of my own >>preparation. :) > >Yes, it is actually true that Shredder 8 plays this actively from its book too, >but you shouldn't have copied the Evans gambit for a tournament game IMHO. > >Peter > >Ok, better add a ":)" .. Both Bruce Moreland and I have played the Evan's multiple times. I've had it "primed" in more than one WMCCC but my opponent went for c5 instead of e5 and it never happened... :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.