Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:21:34 05/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 2004 at 22:24:37, William Bryant wrote: >On May 23, 2004 at 20:40:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 23, 2004 at 19:40:04, William Bryant wrote: >> >>>I am using a split table, depth priority and always replace. >>> >>>If the entry in the depth priortiy table has an entry that matches the hash sign >>>and >>>entry type is invalid, but the entry has a best move, >>>does this best move get used over a best move stored in the always replace table >>>if >>>it has a different best move? >>> >>>My thought is yes it does. >>> >>>William >> >> >>You really should not have the _same_ position in both tables. The entry in the >>depth-preferred is more accurate. > >So, I hope that one of the two tables generates a cutoff, >but if not, search the bestMove. > >If both tables have a bestMove, use the depthPreferred move. > >William I don't even allow a duplicate into the always-store table, if there is an entry in the depth-preferred table with a matching signature. IE position X is in one or the other but not both...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.