Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:13:33 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 06:41:00, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On May 23, 2004 at 16:24:54, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On May 23, 2004 at 15:07:39, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>> I have always enjoyed reading your page at >>>http://members.home.nl/matador/chess840.htm - each time I read it - I >>>reintrepret it or get new ideas. >>>I am anxiously waiting for more updates to it - as would most other amateur >>>programmers I guess :) >>>Do you have any future plans to update it ? Some pretty interesting topics are >>>marked as "under construction" >> >>I hope to make another start soon, I first must rewrite (split) the page to make >>things more surveyable, something I am not looking forward. >> >>I wonder where start, more search stuff, or positional stuff, any preferences? >> >>Ed > >Ed, >I'd like to see more of the Rebel evaluation stuff. The more details, the >better. In particular, evaluating king attacks and passed pawns. King attack is already addressed, evaluation of passed pawns is indeed a good issue too. >It would also be interesting to hear some background - how you arrived at what, >what else you tried & discarded, how confident you are about it, any general >thoughts, etc. That would take too much to read, I prefer to stay on topic and as short as possible. Your question is much better suited for a forum, so: I feel my way of doing king safety is okay, I can't say that about the evaluation of passed pawns, I feel most insecure about it. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.