Author: Slater Wold
Date: 07:35:55 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 02:48:25, Derek Paquette wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 02:22:43, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On May 23, 2004 at 19:59:01, Robert C Gates wrote: >> >>> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>>Wild 1114 [6] 0 8 0 8 >>>Loser's 927 [6] 0 10 0 10 >>>Crazyhouse 1356 [6] 1 3 0 4 >>>Bullet 2922 464 148 137 749 2963 (17-May-2004) >> >>Win : 62% >>Loss: 20% >>Draw: 18% >> >>>Blitz 3103 5432 1976 2674 10082 3212 (28-Apr-2004) >> >>Win : 54% >>Loss: 20% >>Draw: 26% >> >> >>>Standard 2566 1036 274 425 1735 2913 (22-Jun-2003) >> >>Win : 60% >>Loss: 16% >>Draw: 24% >> >> >>Over 12,566 games, the W/L/D ratio's pretty much stay the same over all time >>controls. Interesting... > >this just shows how much fast hardware really does make a difference, only 16% >loss out of 1036 games in standard time control! my sweet jesus 4% in 12,000+ games isn't much...IMO anyway... The HW would be more of a factor in shorter game (bullet), I think.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.