Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 07:46:34 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 10:13:33, Ed Schröder wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 06:41:00, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On May 23, 2004 at 16:24:54, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On May 23, 2004 at 15:07:39, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>> I have always enjoyed reading your page at >>>>http://members.home.nl/matador/chess840.htm - each time I read it - I >>>>reintrepret it or get new ideas. >>>>I am anxiously waiting for more updates to it - as would most other amateur >>>>programmers I guess :) >>>>Do you have any future plans to update it ? Some pretty interesting topics are >>>>marked as "under construction" >>> >>>I hope to make another start soon, I first must rewrite (split) the page to make >>>things more surveyable, something I am not looking forward. >>> >>>I wonder where start, more search stuff, or positional stuff, any preferences? >>> >>>Ed >> >>Ed, > >>I'd like to see more of the Rebel evaluation stuff. The more details, the >>better. In particular, evaluating king attacks and passed pawns. > >King attack is already addressed, evaluation of passed pawns is indeed a good >issue too. Passed pawn evaluation is the issue that gives me the most trouble. It is one thing I constantly modify and I'm never happy with it... > > >>It would also be interesting to hear some background - how you arrived at what, >>what else you tried & discarded, how confident you are about it, any general >>thoughts, etc. > >That would take too much to read, I prefer to stay on topic and as short as >possible. Your question is much better suited for a forum, so: I feel my way of >doing king safety is okay, I can't say that about the evaluation of passed >pawns, I feel most insecure about it. > >Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.