Author: Ralph E. Carter
Date: 14:03:48 12/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 1998 at 16:52:01, Komputer Korner wrote: >On December 18, 1998 at 16:39:56, Ralph E. Carter wrote: > >>On December 18, 1998 at 16:18:52, Herbert Gindl wrote: >> >>> >>>I compared Genius 5 under W98 with the so called Genius 6: >>>(K6-2 400 128MB) >>>Both: 32 MB hash, no permanent brain, no book, level infinite >>> >>>After >>> >>>1.a4 >>> >>>Genius5 shows: 1.Sf6 (1/20) 9-21 0.27 00.38 >>>d4d5Sf3Lf5Lg5e6e3Lb4 >>> >>>1. Sf6 (1/20) 10-22 0.24 1:55 Sf6d4d5Sf3Lf5Lg5Se4e6 >>> >>> >>>Now to Genius 6: >>> >>>1. a4 >>>Genius6 shows: as above, absolute no difference. >>> >>>Now I know for sure why there is no Genius5 engine included. >> >>Genius 5 is an excellent program. >>But this is one of those facts, which IF true, must be made known to all >>prospective customers. >>This is a legitimate function of chess newsgroups. >>Thank you. > >This is not conclusive that the engines aren't different. A bunch of positions >are needed to prove that. >-- >Komputer Korner (P.S. I am still pointedly replying to Mr. You-know-who in rgcc, who ridiculed people who like to investigate such things. I am still fuming.) ((P.P.S. I am amazed that noone here has "bit" on the serious controversy in rgcc, to which you are a recent contributor. I think this is WHY we have these groups.)) mongrel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.