Author: José Carlos
Date: 10:09:42 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 12:39:35, Ed Schröder wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 12:07:56, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On May 24, 2004 at 10:13:33, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>>It would also be interesting to hear some background - how you arrived at what, >>>>what else you tried & discarded, how confident you are about it, any general >>>>thoughts, etc. >>> >>>That would take too much to read, I prefer to stay on topic and as short as >>>possible. Your question is much better suited for a forum, so: I feel my way of >>>doing king safety is okay, I can't say that about the evaluation of passed >>>pawns, I feel most insecure about it. > >>It would be interesting to know how you determine if a change you make is an >>improvement (if you are allowed to tell us, of course). > >You guessed well, I can't tell. > >Ed But Ed, you surely had a method to determine that way before meeting Christophe (which is the reason, I guess, you can't tell now). Could you comment on your pre-Christophe testing methods? Thanks in advance. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.