Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 13:36:07 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 16:32:17, Matthew Hull wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 16:21:24, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 24, 2004 at 16:01:53, Matthew Hull wrote: >> >>>On May 24, 2004 at 15:36:53, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>DIEP played two standard games against crafty yesterday on ICC with Vincent >>>>>himself presiding (and pontificating). DIEP lost them both. >>>> >>>>Oh, sir. Incredible, you were not interested in the games but you read all >the >>>Vincent's messages.... >>>> >>>>Interesting.... Could you comment what it really happened in such games in >>>>detail? >>>> >>>>I know the answer: No. :)))) >>> >>> >>> >>>[Event "ICS Rated Standard match"] >>>[Site "ICC"] >>>[Date "2004.05.24"] >>>[Round "-"] >>>[White "DIEP"] >>>[Black "crafty"] >>>[Result "0-1"] >>>[WhiteElo "2540"] >>>[BlackElo "2740"] >>>[TimeControl "3600+30"] >>> >>>1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 e6 4. O-O Be7 5. c4 O-O 6. b3 c5 7. e3 Nc6 8. >>>Bb2 b6 9. Nc3 Bb7 10. cxd5 Nxd5 11. Nxd5 Qxd5 12. d4 Rad8 13. Ne5 Qd6 14. >>>Nxc6 Bxc6 15. Qg4 cxd4 16. Bxd4 g6 17. Bxc6 Qxc6 18. Rac1 Qb7 19. Qf4 Rd6 >>>20. Bb2 Rfd8 21. h4 Qa6 22. a4 Qe2 23. Bd4 f6 24. Rfe1 Qa2 25. Rc7 e5 26. >>>Qe4 R6d7 27. Rxd7 Rxd7 28. Qc6 Rd8 29. Qe6+ Kf8 30. Bc3 Qc2 31. Qc4 a6 32. >>>Re2 Qd3 33. Rd2 Qxc4 34. Rxd8+ Bxd8 35. bxc4 Ke7 36. e4 h5 37. Kf1 Kd6 38. >>>Ke2 Kc5 39. Kd3 Bc7 40. f3 f5 41. Bd2 fxe4+ 42. fxe4 Bd6 43. Bc3 Bc7 44. >>>Be1 Bd8 45. Bd2 Kc6 46. Bc3 Bc7 47. Kc2 Kd7 48. Kd2 Bd6 49. a5 >>> >>> >>>49. a5?! >>> >>> >>>Unforced blunder, wouldn't you say? >>> >>> >>>49. ... bxa5 50. >>>Bxa5 Bc5 51. Ke2 Bd4 52. Kf3 Kc6 53. Bb4 Bb6 54. Bc3 Bc7 55. Ke3 a5 56. Kd3 >>>a4 57. Bb2 Bd6 58. Kc2 Kd7 59. c5 Bxc5 60. Bxe5 Ke6 61. Bf4 Bd4 62. Kc1 Ke7 >>>63. Kc2 Ke6 64. Kc1 Kd7 65. Kb1 Kc6 66. Ka2 Bg7 67. Ka3 Kc5 68. Kxa4 Kd4 >>>69. Bg5 Kxe4 70. Kb3 Be5 71. Kc2 Bxg3 72. Kd1 Kf3 73. Bf6 Kg4 74. Ke2 Bxh4 >>>75. Bd4 Kh3 76. Kf1 g5 77. Be5 g4 0-1 >> >>Finally, you post the games... Thanks. >> >>However, the blunder was pointed by Vincent. Could you offer us more details? > > >Oh, you mean he told you an excuse? Why don't you enlighten us? If we only >knew what the excuse was, we could change the result to 1-0. > >:) I understand. You are not able to post more details about the opening or the game itself. Again, you prove my point. I always say people in this Forum do the work for me. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.