Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 16:49:57 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 16:59:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 16:31:13, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 24, 2004 at 16:18:39, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On May 24, 2004 at 15:51:42, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>> 65 Crafty 18.12/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2483 >>>>Shr7.04 A1200 3.5-43.5 DpFrit8 A1200 3.5-24.5 DpFrit7 A1200 6-38 >>>>Fritz 8 A1200 7.5-37.5 Shred6P A1200 7-36 DpFritz K6450 6.5-33.5 >>>>Junior7 K6450 15-31 Fritz 7 K6-2 9-31 Nimzo 8 K6450 14-26 >>>>Gandalf5 K6-2 10-20 Hiar732 K6450 1-2 Gan432h K6450 22-24 >>>>Fritz532 P200 27.5-18.5 Hiar732 P200X 19-23 Junior5 P200X 5.5-5.5 >>>>Shre3 P200MMX 26.5-13.5 >>>> >>>> >>>>No, read the list carefully. It is not a sarcasm. :))))) >>> >>>Read the list MORE carefully. It _is_ sarcasm. >>> >>>* Shredder is running on a 1200 MHz machine >>>* Crafty is running on a 450 MHz machine >>>* It is Shredder 7.04, not Shredder 8 >>>* It is Crafty 18.12, not Crafty 19.13 >>> >>>43.5-3.5 means very little in regards to Shredder 8 vs. Crafty 19.13 on equal >>>hardware. >> >>Well, If the program were other.... How much stronger can be Crafty 19.XXXX over >>Crafty 18.XXXX. The difference must no be very remarkable. What I see is >>Shredder smashing Crafty in this list. >> >>Crafty is not an opponent for Shredder. We can put Shredder 7.04 against Crafty >>19.XXXXX and the result will be the same: Crafty would be smashed again. >> >>I also read the thread carefully and all the proposal is just a clowning. > >You ignore the hardware difference that is very important. >Shredder is stronger than Crafty but 43.5-3.5 result is not realistic and 70% >result with equal hardware is more realistic. > >Uri Incredible! That is the second thing of the year that you are right! Fantastic. You are doing a lot of effort! Hurrah for Blass! Finally, he is not writing a lot of nonsense.
This page took 0.22 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.