Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:01:34 05/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 18:28:32, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 18:24:26, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On May 24, 2004 at 12:06:46, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>In a thread below, there is a post about Blargh, ICCs top computer. It has won >>>60% of its games at standard time controls, and only lost 16% in almost 3,000 >>>games! >>> >>>I am interested to know the OoO (opinion of outcome) of EVERYONE at the >>>following experiment, I will be in contact with the operator of Blargh, and will >>>try to set this up. >>> >>>Crafty 19.13 on an AMD FX53 (64-bit) vs Shredder 8 on a Dual Opteron 2.2Ghz >>>(32-bit) >>> >>>10 game match. 120/0. >>> >>>Opinions? >> >>How about 30 games? >>If the time is too long, change to 40/0 and you can get the volume up. > >By this logic you can change to 1/0 and get 1200 games. By this logic I can change to game in one nanosecond and get 1.2e12 games. Or it is just a strawman invented by you with no connection to what I had to say. >The result may be different with different time control I agree >and I respect the >decision to play 120/0 time control I prefer the decision to play 120/0, but 10 games is not enough to make a logical statistical decision about strength. Therefore, I suggested either lots of patience or G/40. If you are going to spend hours and hours of computer time, it would be nice if you could draw some conclusion from the data when you are finished.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.