Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Blargh ICC's Strongest Computer

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 03:27:56 05/25/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 24, 2004 at 19:05:54, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On May 24, 2004 at 19:00:55, Peter Berger wrote:
>
>>On May 24, 2004 at 17:52:53, Sune Fischer wrote:
>>
>>>>(registered & unrated | !computer & rating > myrating-600 | rating >
>>>>myrating-400) & noescape & !wild
>>>
>>>How does this read?
>>>I wonder if it does what was intended.
>>>
>>>-S.
>>
>>Tough to guess what was intended.
>>
>>The opponent might be a computer or an unrated human . In case of being a
>>computer it might play if it is rated higher than 400 points lower or unrated
>>games. The opponent might still be on a free week account, but him/her being a
>>guest can be taken care of with variables. It is likely that this formula does
>>only some of the intended.
>>
>>Peter
>
>I meant litterally, the use of boolean operators is not clear, ie does he mean:
>
>(registered & (unrated | !computer) & (rating > myrating-600) | (rating >
>myrating-400)) & noescape & !wild
>
>or
>
>((registered & unrated) | ((!computer & rating) > myrating-600) | (rating >
>myrating-400)) & noescape & !wild
>
>or....
>
>The real question is of course how the server software chooses to read it.
>
>-S.

ICC should read this as

(registered & (unrated | ((!computer & rating > myrating-600) | (rating
>myrating-400))) & noescape & !wild)






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.