Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 10:41:34 05/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2004 at 23:53:17, Keith Evans wrote: >On May 24, 2004 at 19:47:27, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 24, 2004 at 16:44:50, Matthew Hull wrote: >> >>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:36:07, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:32:17, Matthew Hull wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:21:24, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:01:53, Matthew Hull wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 15:36:53, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>DIEP played two standard games against crafty yesterday on ICC with >>>Vincent >>>>>>himself presiding (and pontificating). DIEP lost them both. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Oh, sir. Incredible, you were not interested in the games but you read all >>>>>the >>>Vincent's messages.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Interesting.... Could you comment what it really happened in such games in >>>>>>>>detail? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I know the answer: No. :)))) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[Event "ICS Rated Standard match"] >>>>>>>[Site "ICC"] >>>>>>>[Date "2004.05.24"] >>>>>>>[Round "-"] >>>>>>>[White "DIEP"] >>>>>>>[Black "crafty"] >>>>>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>>>>>[WhiteElo "2540"] >>>>>>>[BlackElo "2740"] >>>>>>>[TimeControl "3600+30"] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 e6 4. O-O Be7 5. c4 O-O 6. b3 c5 7. e3 Nc6 8. >>>>>>>Bb2 b6 9. Nc3 Bb7 10. cxd5 Nxd5 11. Nxd5 Qxd5 12. d4 Rad8 13. Ne5 Qd6 14. >>>>>>>Nxc6 Bxc6 15. Qg4 cxd4 16. Bxd4 g6 17. Bxc6 Qxc6 18. Rac1 Qb7 19. Qf4 Rd6 >>>>>>>20. Bb2 Rfd8 21. h4 Qa6 22. a4 Qe2 23. Bd4 f6 24. Rfe1 Qa2 25. Rc7 e5 26. >>>>>>>Qe4 R6d7 27. Rxd7 Rxd7 28. Qc6 Rd8 29. Qe6+ Kf8 30. Bc3 Qc2 31. Qc4 a6 32. >>>>>>>Re2 Qd3 33. Rd2 Qxc4 34. Rxd8+ Bxd8 35. bxc4 Ke7 36. e4 h5 37. Kf1 Kd6 38. >>>>>>>Ke2 Kc5 39. Kd3 Bc7 40. f3 f5 41. Bd2 fxe4+ 42. fxe4 Bd6 43. Bc3 Bc7 44. >>>>>>>Be1 Bd8 45. Bd2 Kc6 46. Bc3 Bc7 47. Kc2 Kd7 48. Kd2 Bd6 49. a5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>49. a5?! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Unforced blunder, wouldn't you say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>49. ... bxa5 50. >>>>>>>Bxa5 Bc5 51. Ke2 Bd4 52. Kf3 Kc6 53. Bb4 Bb6 54. Bc3 Bc7 55. Ke3 a5 56. Kd3 >>>>>>>a4 57. Bb2 Bd6 58. Kc2 Kd7 59. c5 Bxc5 60. Bxe5 Ke6 61. Bf4 Bd4 62. Kc1 Ke7 >>>>>>>63. Kc2 Ke6 64. Kc1 Kd7 65. Kb1 Kc6 66. Ka2 Bg7 67. Ka3 Kc5 68. Kxa4 Kd4 >>>>>>>69. Bg5 Kxe4 70. Kb3 Be5 71. Kc2 Bxg3 72. Kd1 Kf3 73. Bf6 Kg4 74. Ke2 Bxh4 >>>>>>>75. Bd4 Kh3 76. Kf1 g5 77. Be5 g4 0-1 >>>>>> >>>>>>Finally, you post the games... Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>>However, the blunder was pointed by Vincent. Could you offer us more >>>details? >> >>>>> >>>>>Oh, you mean he told you an excuse? Why don't you enlighten us? If we only >>>>>knew what the excuse was, we could change the result to 1-0. >>>>> >>>>>:) >>>> >>>>I understand. You are not able to post more details about the opening or the >>>>game itself. Again, you prove my point. >>> >>> >>>Details? Are not the moves before you? Can you not identify the opening? Can >>>you not see the blunder? DIEP made one move that lost a drawn game. Simple. >>> >> >>Of course, man. The opening is a double fianchetto. Simple. >> >>There are another doubtful move by Diep in the transition to the middle game: >>19. Qf4?! Of course, you could not establish why. This is the hint for you. > >What's your point? > >Can you imagine what Vincent would have said if the PGN began: > >[White "crafty"] >[Black "DIEP"] > >Nobody can ever really beat Diep. See: >http://home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/socio.htm This is not the point. I would reask you: What is your point? My point is: He (Mathew) is not able to offer details about the game. That's all.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.