Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM9000 tournaments (final standings - several different time controls)

Author: Jorge

Date: 11:39:36 05/26/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 26, 2004 at 00:10:47, Graham Banks wrote:

>On May 25, 2004 at 15:55:28, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On May 25, 2004 at 03:21:54, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>40 moves in 10 minutes repeating (Athlon 2000)
>>>
>>>FINAL
>>>Name                Wins    Draws   Losses  Games   Score
>>>CM9000 Judge          26      32      12      70     42.0
>>>CM9000 R1             25      30      15      70     40.0
>>>CM9000 Mapi           23      29      18      70     37.5
>>>CM Relentless         19      31      20      70     34.5
>>>CM9000 Plague         17      33      20      70     33.5
>>>CM9000 Cronus         12      40      18      70     32.0
>>>CM 9000 Default       16      31      23      70     31.5
>>>CM9000 SKR            15      28      27      70     26.0
>>>
>>>
>>>40 moves in 20 minutes repeating (Athlon 3200+)
>>>
>>>Judge            38.5
>>>SKR              38.5
>>>Relentless       37.5
>>>Cronus           36.5
>>>R1               35.0
>>>MAPI             33.0
>>>Plague           32.0
>>>Default          28.0
>>>
>>>
>>>40 moves in 40 minutes repeating (Athlon 3200+)
>>>
>>>FINAL
>>>Cronus        40.0
>>>Judge         37.5
>>>R1            37.0
>>>SKR           37.0
>>>Plague        34.5
>>>Mapi          34.0
>>>Relentless    32.5
>>>Default       27.5
>>>
>>>
>>>40 moves in 80 minutes repeating (Pentium 4)
>>>
>>>Name                Wins    Draws   Losses  Games   Score
>>>CM9000_Plague         12      23       7      42     23.5
>>>CM9000_Mapi           12      22       8      42     23.0
>>>CM9000_Cronus         11      24       7      42     23.0
>>>CM9000_R1             12      21       9      42     22.5
>>>CM_Relentless          8      25       9      42     20.5
>>>CM9000_Judge           9      21      12      42     19.5
>>>CM9000_SKR             7      25      10      42     19.5
>>>CM_9000_Default        5      23      14      42     16.5
>>
>>
>>     Hi Graham
>>     Did you notice one interesting thing: the difference
>>     between first/last place is diminshing the longer
>>     the time control chosen.
>>     Kurt
>
>Hi Kurt,
>yes I had noticed this.
>I believe that changing the material values slightly (especially the queen),
>increasing the selectivity and leaving all positional values A/D and M/P values
>at default might possibly produce the best results for CM9000. This is the tack
>that I might try next.
>I also have another idea I might try too.
>I'll keep you posted.
>Graham.

Well not exactly, the Range from 40mvs/20mins to 40mvs/40mins increased from
10.5 to 12.5, but that seems to be trend overall. What is perculiar to me is
that the default setting is supposed to be the best setting in various time
controls, but that is obviously not happening here, actually quite the opposite
:).

jorge



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.