Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 22:59:00 05/26/04
[Event "FOT 2004 90m+ 5s"]
[Site "ChessBase Server"]
[Date "2004.05.26"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Triple Brain"]
[Black "Hiarcs 9"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B42"]
[Annotator "Utzinger,K"]
[PlyCount "192"]
1. e4 {1s TripleBrain (Shredder / Ruffian) 2x AMD Athlon XP 2400+ / AMD
Athlon XP 3200+ / Timo Klaustermeyer} c5 {
0s AMD Athlon XP @ 2,2 GHz / Michael Schiklang} 2. Nf3 {6s} e6 {0s} 3. d4 {6s}
cxd4 {0s} 4. Nxd4 {11s} a6 {0s} 5. Bd3 {6s} Nf6 {0s} 6. O-O {5s} Qc7 {0s} 7.
Qe2 {7s} d6 {0s} 8. c4 {6s} g6 {0s} 9. Nc3 {7s} Bg7 {0s} 10. Be3 {10s} O-O {0s}
11. f4 {8s} Nbd7 {0s} 12. Rac1 {3:19} Re8 {0s} 13. Kh1 {6s} b6 {0s} 14. b4 {1s}
Bb7 {0s} 15. Nb3 {1s Both last book move - Beide letzter Buchzug} Nh5 {
0.76/11 1:18 More usual here is 15...Rac8 but the textmove is often played
later with the correct idea f5 - Ueblicher ist hier 15...Tac8, aber der
Textzug wird oftmals spaeter gespielt mit der Idee, f5 folgen zulassen} 16. a4
{3:39} f5 {0.82/12 22s} 17. exf5 {2:41} exf5 {0.73/13 22s} 18. Nd5 {2:35} Qd8 {
0.73/12 27s More usual is 18...Qb8 in this kind of position - In diesem
Stellungstyp ist 18...Db8ueblicher} 19. Qf3 {6:29} Ndf6 {0.51/12 3:25} 20. a5 {
2:51} Bxd5 {0.41/12 2:55} 21. cxd5 {2:39} bxa5 {0.23/13 0s} 22. bxa5 {
2:27 In my opinion 22.Nxa5 aiming at c6 is stronger - Meiner Meinung nach is
22.Sxa5, was nach c6 schielt, besser} Ng4 {0.31/12 2:25 Another option was of
course the centralizing knight jump to e4 - Eine Alternative war das
zentralisierende Springmanoever nach e4} 23. Bg1 {2:28} Rb8 {0.20/12 17s This
would not have been possible had White played Nxa5 - Das waere nicht moeglich
gewesen, haette Weiss frueher Sxa5 gespielt} 24. Rb1 {2:23} Qh4 {0.17/12 2:27
With the threat Re3 since Bxe3 would be punished by Qxh2 mate - Mit der
Drohung Te3, das Lxe3 wegen Dxh2 Matt nicht moeglich waere} 25. g3 {6s} Qh3 {
0.09/12 55s Repeating the threat Re3 - Erneut mit der Drohung Te3} 26. Qg2 {
1:18} Qxg2+ {0.13/13 41s} 27. Kxg2 {1:40} Ne3+ {0.14/14 39s} 28. Bxe3 {1:29}
Rxe3 {0.14/15 1s} 29. Rf3 {2:04} Rxf3 {0.09/14 2:49} 30. Kxf3 {6s} Bc3 {
0.10/15 2:24 After a sharp looking middle game we have an end game which is
about equal - Nach einem scharf aussehenden Mittelspiel ist ein ausgeglichenes
Endspiel entstanden} 31. Ke2 {11s} Nf6 {0.12/14 1:04} 32. Kd1 {57s} Kf8 {
0.02/14 1:27} 33. Kc2 {32s} Nxd5 {0.13/15 2:29} 34. Bc4 {10s} Ne3+ {
0.15/16 1:32} 35. Kxc3 {42s} Rc8 {0.17/17 58s Regains the piece since 36.Nd2
is met by 36...d5 - Gewinnt die Figur zurueck, denn 36.Sd2 wird mit 36...d5
beantwortet} 36. Kd4 {59s} Nxc4 {0.20/17 40s} 37. Rc1 {1:15} d5 {0.20/16 23s}
38. Kxd5 {1:37} Ne3+ {0.47/16 3:35} 39. Ke6 {4s} Rb8 {0.47/14 1:28 Human
players would perhaps prefer 39...Rxc1 40.Nxc1 Nf1 but without a good endgame
knowledge it's hard to predict the outcome - Menschliche Spieler wuerden
wahrscheinlich 39...Txc1 40.Sxc1 Sf1 vorziehen. Ohne grosses Endspielwissen
ist der Ausgang jedoch schwierg abzuschaetzen} 40. Nd4 {1:50} Rb4 {?! Not best
in my opinion and somewhat strange that Hiarcs9 plays this move at search
depth 10 only and after 0 seconds - Nicht das Beste wie ich meine. Und etwas
komisch, dass Hiarcs9 diesen Zug bei Suchtiefe 10 und 0 Sekunden ausspielt 0.
48/10 0s} 41. Rc8+ {1:47} Kg7 {0.48/5 0s} 42. Rc7+ {1:42} Kh6 {1.26/15 57s} 43.
Nf3 {1:42 With the threat Ng5 followed by Rxh7 mate - Mit der Drohung Sg5
gefolgt von Txh7 Matt} Re4+ {1.40/15 4s} 44. Kf7 {
1:30 White has now a clear advantage - Nun hat Weiss klaren Vorteil} Nc4 {
1.40/15 16s} 45. Kf8 {1:33} Nd6 {
1.40/17 0s Preparing Re8 mate - Bereitet Te8 Matt vor} 46. Ne5 {1:31} Rb4 {
1.40/16 28s} 47. Rc6 {58s} Rb8+ {1.40/16 29s} 48. Ke7 {54s} Ne4 {1.40/16 1:02}
49. Rxa6 {19s} Rb7+ {1.40/16 1:36} 50. Kd8 {3s} Rb2 {1.00/13 56s} 51. g4 {26s}
fxg4 {1.02/13 1:15} 52. Rc6 {2:28 Why not 52.Nxg4 Kh5 53.Nf6 Nxf6 54.Txf6 with
excellent winning chances for White - Weshalb nicht 52.Sxg4 Kh5 53.Sf6 Sxf6 54.
Txf6 mit sehr guten Gewinnchancen fuer Weiss} Kh5 {1.17/13 2:42} 53. Rc7 {1:35}
Rb8+ {1.17/13 3:35} 54. Kd7 {1s} Ra8 {1.20/13 1:59} 55. Kc6 {2s} Nf6 {
1.22/13 56s} 56. Nc4 {1:28} Kh4 {1.91/15 5:33} 57. Kb7 {1:45} Rg8 {1.91/15 0s}
58. Rf7 {1:06} Kh3 {1.75/15 0s} 59. Rxf6 {1:03} Kxh2 {2.41/15 2:26} 60. Rd6 {
? What a pity: after 60.a6 I think White wins - Schade, denn 60.a6 haette die
Partie wohl gewonnen1s} g3 {1.89/13 2:35} 61. Ne3 {1:02} Re8 {1.51/14 1:32} 62.
Rd2+ {1:00} Kh3 {1.59/15 0s} 63. Ng2 {1:06} Re7+ {1.78/16 2s} 64. Kb6 {55s} h5
{1.79/16 0s} 65. a6 {53s} Re6+ {1.87/16 15s} 66. Kb7 {36s} Re7+ {1.66/13 19s}
67. Kb6 {31s} Re6+ {0.00/18 50s} 68. Kb5 {2s} Re7 {1.87/16 49s} 69. Ra2 {49s}
h4 {1.81/15 15s} 70. f5 {47s} gxf5 {1.40/12 32s} 71. Nf4+ {55s} Kg4 {1.40/5 0s}
72. Ra4 {55s} Rh7 {1.31/11 8s Black has enough counterplay for a draw - Nun
hat Schwarz genuegend Gegenspiel fuer ein Remis} 73. Nd5+ {34s} Kg5 {
0.19/12 1:26} 74. Nf4 {54s} Kg4 {0.00/15 1:00} 75. Ne2+ {54s} Kf3 {1.40/13 26s}
76. Nd4+ {11s} Kf2 {1.00/12 32s} 77. Ra2+ {14s} Ke3 {0.98/12 28s} 78. Nxf5+ {
2:12} Ke4 {0.74/13 1s} 79. Nd6+ {27s} Kf3 {0.26/11 42s} 80. a7 {1s} Rxa7 {
0.00/13 22s} 81. Rxa7 {5s} g2 {0.02/13 25s The free pawns are very strong so
that White's big advantage in material is not sufficient for a win - Die
Freibauern sind so stark, dass der grosse schwarze Materialvorteil fuer einen
Gewinn nicht genuegt} 82. Rg7 {2s} h3 {-0.12/11 24s} 83. Rf7+ {3s} Ke3 {
-0.16/14 43s} 84. Nc4+ {1s} Kd4 {-0.18/15 38s} 85. Rf4+ {28s} Kd3 {-0.20/14 21s
} 86. Ne5+ {26s} Ke3 {-0.24/14 23s} 87. Rf3+ {2s} Ke4 {-0.33/15 22s} 88. Rxh3 {
3s} g1=Q {-0.32/15 27s} 89. Nc4 {1s} Qg5+ {-0.32/13 36s} 90. Kb4 {23s} Kd4 {
-0.32/13 35s} 91. Rb3 {1s It's a clear draw now - Nun ist es klar Remis} Qe7+ {
-0.32/12 18s} 92. Kb5 {11s} Qc5+ {-0.32/13 16s} 93. Ka4 {13s} Qc6+ {
-0.32/14 32s} 94. Ka5 {8s} Qa8+ {-0.32/15 36s} 95. Kb4 {22s} Qf8+ {-0.32/15 21s
} 96. Kb5 {2s} Qe8+ {-0.32/14 40s K} 1/2-1/2
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.