Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:57:00 05/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2004 at 11:07:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On May 27, 2004 at 10:15:08, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 26, 2004 at 21:45:06, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On May 24, 2004 at 22:08:48, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>> >>>>On May 24, 2004 at 19:49:57, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:59:18, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:31:13, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 16:18:39, Russell Reagan wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On May 24, 2004 at 15:51:42, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 65 Crafty 18.12/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz, 2483 >>>>>>>>>Shr7.04 A1200 3.5-43.5 DpFrit8 A1200 3.5-24.5 DpFrit7 A1200 6-38 >>>>>>>>>Fritz 8 A1200 7.5-37.5 Shred6P A1200 7-36 DpFritz K6450 6.5-33.5 >>>>>>>>>Junior7 K6450 15-31 Fritz 7 K6-2 9-31 Nimzo 8 K6450 14-26 >>>>>>>>>Gandalf5 K6-2 10-20 Hiar732 K6450 1-2 Gan432h K6450 22-24 >>>>>>>>>Fritz532 P200 27.5-18.5 Hiar732 P200X 19-23 Junior5 P200X 5.5-5.5 >>>>>>>>>Shre3 P200MMX 26.5-13.5 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>No, read the list carefully. It is not a sarcasm. :))))) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Read the list MORE carefully. It _is_ sarcasm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>* Shredder is running on a 1200 MHz machine >>>>>>>>* Crafty is running on a 450 MHz machine >>>>>>>>* It is Shredder 7.04, not Shredder 8 >>>>>>>>* It is Crafty 18.12, not Crafty 19.13 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>43.5-3.5 means very little in regards to Shredder 8 vs. Crafty 19.13 on equal >>>>>>>>hardware. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Well, If the program were other.... How much stronger can be Crafty 19.XXXX over >>>>>>>Crafty 18.XXXX. The difference must no be very remarkable. What I see is >>>>>>>Shredder smashing Crafty in this list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Crafty is not an opponent for Shredder. We can put Shredder 7.04 against Crafty >>>>>>>19.XXXXX and the result will be the same: Crafty would be smashed again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I also read the thread carefully and all the proposal is just a clowning. >>>>>> >>>>>>You ignore the hardware difference that is very important. >>>>>>Shredder is stronger than Crafty but 43.5-3.5 result is not realistic and 70% >>>>>>result with equal hardware is more realistic. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>Incredible! That is the second thing of the year that you are right! Fantastic. >>>>>You are doing a lot of effort! >>>>> >>>>>Hurrah for Blass! Finally, he is not writing a lot of nonsense. >>>> >>>>Arturo, I hate to break this to you, but you are simply not qualified to get >>>>into a flame war with Uri. Uri has diligently developed his invincible >>>>obstinacy with strict training. He has perfected the ruthless arts of >>>>nitpicking and negativity. There is no shame in retreat; even powerful flame >>>>warriors fear "Stone Deaf". Patience, young sprout. Your time will come. >>>> >>>>http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame78.html >>>> >>>>anthony >>> >>>There is no problem. One detail. Uri Blass behavior is easy to define: >>> >>>1) He posts some question about any technical topic to get the free information. >>> >>>2) Two months later when his implementation doesnt function, he say something >>>negative to create a long polemic and to draw new conclusions. >> >>Not correct. >> >>> >>>3) A topic is posted and he begins a lot of irrelevant details of your thing >>>called Movie or Movei..... such as some famous topic of the wonderful opening >>>with 1. f3!! ;) >> >>Vincent suggested matche that will never happen because he wants money for it. >>I responded and suggested a match that can happen. > >This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he would do such >a match. But he is not even 1% sure. No, that is an _outright_ lie once again. I am reasonably confident Crafty would win. But even if I were 100% confident, I would not bet on the outcome. I don't bet. I'm an "adult"... > >What i tried to show is that only a few things in your life have a significant >impact. Like that game you play against Kasparov matters. > >>The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a relevant >>topic. > >Your random topic changes are not appreciated. > >Try to contribute something useful to the computerchess community instead of >hearing everybody out here meanwhile posting so much nonsense that no one has a >clue what you learned yourself from the matters. > >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.