Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 17:18:39 05/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2004 at 18:39:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 27, 2004 at 18:13:17, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 27, 2004 at 17:43:37, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 27, 2004 at 17:27:00, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>><snipped> >>>>No, I dont see any relation as always. Maybe you join know with your Movei >>>>Topic. What is the relevance? >>> >>> >>>Here are the words of Vincent: >>> >>>"This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he would do >>>such a match. But he is not even 1% sure." >>> >>>Here is my reply: >>> >>>"No >>> >>>hyatt refuse to bet for money as a principle. >>>It is clear that you throw the bet idea only to avoid the match." >>> >>> >>> >>>If you fail to see the relation between vincent's words and my reply then I >>>cannot help you. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>What is this? An Ionesco's score? What are you talking about? >> >>You initial delclation was: "Vincent suggested matche that will never happen >>because he wants money for it. I responded and suggested a match that can >>happen. The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a >>relevant topic." >> >>Question: What is the relevance of your topic? It is boring and useless. > >It is in link >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367484 > >You said that you do not see the relation in reply to >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367499 > > > >explanation of the relation in the first link(367484): > >Here are the relevant words in that link > >"> >>3) A topic is posted and he begins a lot of irrelevant details of your thing >>called Movie or Movei..... such as some famous topic of the wonderful opening >>with 1. f3!! ;) > >Vincent suggested match that will never happen because he wants money for it. >I responded and suggested a match that can happen. > >The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a relevant >topic. > >Uri" > > > >The relation is that I thought that you meant to the topic of the match >Diep-Crafty in 3. > >Uri Well, your behavior as a third part is not logic either. I suggest you one thing and Hyatt too: Show at the WCC 2004 and try to do the best. Instead of changing a topic for anoter nasty topic, show your capacities there. That is my point. Mentioning the same Match, again and again, show one thing: that you are dedicated in creating long absurd threads in this Forum instead working for WCC or you already know that you are not able to improve your engine. Such topic of the match is old, useless and a waste of time. If your mind can only produce such replies, go ahead but I will close this mess Forum for another 6 months. Already in ICT4, the Diep book preparation was quite good. Thus, that is not my intention to continue wasting my expensive time in trying to reach your understanding. Good luck and continue creating craps here! Congrats.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.