Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chris, did your experiment ended any different than this?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 12:23:50 05/28/04

Go up one level in this thread


On May 28, 2004 at 14:53:08, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>Fine.  Do you as a human ever open with 1. g4?  Why not.  Does your program?

1. g4 is a weak move. 1.e4 is (one of) the most played openings.

>Exactly the same principle.  I don't avoid e4 because Crafty can't play it.  I
>avoid it because there is too much prepared book analysis for those lines since
>most computer chess programmers prefer e4 and a more open board.  I noticed in
>1986 that Cray Blitz played 1. d4 very well since it had decent ideas about pawn
>structure and positional play.  Crafty is the same.  I've even had a GM play
>with it and his conclusion was exactly the same.  "It really plays d4 openings
>well, I'd stick with that and avoid all the analysis following 1. e4."
>
>In order to win a computer chess event, you first have to avoid losing games
>before your program even gets a chance to make a decision.  That means avoiding
>book losses as well as possible...
>
>And no, we won't be repeating CCT6 variations either. :)

Well should anyone want to prepare against you they just had their work cut in
half.

I don't really buy that d4 is less well booked than e4.

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.