Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:10:20 05/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2004 at 15:55:56, Mark Young wrote: >On May 28, 2004 at 12:40:19, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On May 28, 2004 at 11:14:03, Chris Taylor wrote: >> >>>60'/20+60'/20+60' 2004 >>> >>> 12345678901234567890 >>>1 Shredder 8 01½1½11111110111½111 16.5/20 >>>2 Wcrafty 19.13 10½0½00000001000½000 3.5/20 >>> >>>I have not been through the games yet. I will give them a quick look and post >>>full details, later! >>>What I will say is Crafty was run in uci..... >>> >>>Chris..... >> >>You should run another match with Crafty 19.13 using your AMD XP 3000+ vs >>Shredder 8 using Duron 800 Mhz or PIII 800 Mhz. This would be a more interesting >>and close match in my view. > >Maybe we should run a Shredder vs Crafty match with Shredder using no hash, and >no table base. We could even mess with Shredders engine parameters. Like setting >the Queen value to 0, and pawn value to 999. I am sure this would be much more >interesting....If the goal is to weaken Shredder so much that Crafty could >win...... As you can see from this result, Crafty was using an AMD XP2400+ with all the conditions equal to my match except that I ran it on a mere 1.2 GHz. Crafty benefit more than shredder 8 as the CPU processing power ========> Jorge I ran a match like Chris proposed initially. I used the Shredder 8 GUI for both programs and the Shredder8.ctg book. Time control was 20/60' + 20/60' + 60'. Match was run on 2 XP2400+ machines with auto232. I stopped at 12 games as my original intention was only 10 games but an extra game was played while I slept so I played another to even out the colors. Final score: Shredder 8 won by 7.5-4.5. Interesting is the fact that the last 7 games were all draws. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367815
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.