Author: Slater Wold
Date: 00:07:41 05/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2004 at 20:57:06, enrico carrisco wrote: >On May 28, 2004 at 18:20:55, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On May 28, 2004 at 18:04:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On May 28, 2004 at 17:50:22, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>Not to mention other "commercial" authors who have participated in CCT. >>> >>>Hmm, I remember Junior being in, and Amir certainly has put up the >>>challenge to Bob a few times (the 10x hardware thing comes to mind). >> >>Which he lost. Meaning both the 10x hardware thing & CCT6. >> >>>Enrico was also in with Hiarcs. >> >>Which came in AFTER Crafty in CCT6. > >Let's keep it in perspective, Slate. I started the thread of support for Crafty >and completely agree Crafty has good chances. However, what you quote above: >Hiarcs ranked 2nd to Crafty after a blitz playoff (no blitz playoffs in WCCC.) >Hiarcs ran on less than 25% of the CPU power and Hiarcs didn't drop a single >game to Crafty in the tournament. I wasn't being or trying to be disrespectful. But you didn't beat Crafty in the tournament. That's not rude, it's just a fact. >I said it before CCT6 even began and will say it now -- 5+3 blitz to settle >tie-breaks in a tournament is foolish, especially considering such statements as >above get made. Agreed. But HIARCS had its chance to beat Crafty and win. And it didn't. Again, just facts.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.