Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:47:07 05/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2004 at 20:21:26, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On May 27, 2004 at 20:18:39, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 27, 2004 at 18:39:37, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 27, 2004 at 18:13:17, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>On May 27, 2004 at 17:43:37, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 27, 2004 at 17:27:00, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>><snipped> >>>>>>No, I dont see any relation as always. Maybe you join know with your Movei >>>>>>Topic. What is the relevance? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Here are the words of Vincent: >>>>> >>>>>"This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he would do >>>>>such a match. But he is not even 1% sure." >>>>> >>>>>Here is my reply: >>>>> >>>>>"No >>>>> >>>>>hyatt refuse to bet for money as a principle. >>>>>It is clear that you throw the bet idea only to avoid the match." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If you fail to see the relation between vincent's words and my reply then I >>>>>cannot help you. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>> >>>>What is this? An Ionesco's score? What are you talking about? >>>> >>>>You initial delclation was: "Vincent suggested matche that will never happen >>>>because he wants money for it. I responded and suggested a match that can >>>>happen. The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a >>>>relevant topic." >>>> >>>>Question: What is the relevance of your topic? It is boring and useless. >>> >>>It is in link >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367484 >>> >>>You said that you do not see the relation in reply to >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367499 >>> >>> >>> >>>explanation of the relation in the first link(367484): >>> >>>Here are the relevant words in that link >>> >>>"> >>>>3) A topic is posted and he begins a lot of irrelevant details of your thing >>>>called Movie or Movei..... such as some famous topic of the wonderful opening >>>>with 1. f3!! ;) >>> >>>Vincent suggested match that will never happen because he wants money for it. >>>I responded and suggested a match that can happen. >>> >>>The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a relevant >>>topic. >>> >>>Uri" >>> >>> >>> >>>The relation is that I thought that you meant to the topic of the match >>>Diep-Crafty in 3. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Well, your behavior as a third part is not logic either. I suggest you one thing >>and Hyatt too: Show at the WCC 2004 and try to do the best. >> >>Instead of changing a topic for anoter nasty topic, show your capacities there. >>That is my point. Mentioning the same Match, again and again, show one thing: >>that you are dedicated in creating long absurd threads in this Forum instead >>working for WCC or you already know that you are not able to improve your >>engine. >> >>Such topic of the match is old, useless and a waste of time. If your mind can >>only produce such replies, go ahead but I will close this mess Forum for another >>6 months. Already in ICT4, the Diep book preparation was quite good. Thus, that >>is not my intention to continue wasting my expensive time in trying to reach >>your understanding. >> >>Good luck and continue creating craps here! Congrats. > >Additionally, what is your category? > >The Swami one? The Jorge Pichard one? The egostistic one? The stubborn one? > >They are unique profiles. You should reveal what your profile is. I do not think that it is very important but I gave some details in my profile. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.