Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 01:19:23 05/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2004 at 03:07:41, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 28, 2004 at 20:57:06, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On May 28, 2004 at 18:20:55, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On May 28, 2004 at 18:04:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>On May 28, 2004 at 17:50:22, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>>Not to mention other "commercial" authors who have participated in CCT. >>>> >>>>Hmm, I remember Junior being in, and Amir certainly has put up the >>>>challenge to Bob a few times (the 10x hardware thing comes to mind). >>> >>>Which he lost. Meaning both the 10x hardware thing & CCT6. >>> >>>>Enrico was also in with Hiarcs. >>> >>>Which came in AFTER Crafty in CCT6. >> >>Let's keep it in perspective, Slate. I started the thread of support for Crafty >>and completely agree Crafty has good chances. However, what you quote above: >>Hiarcs ranked 2nd to Crafty after a blitz playoff (no blitz playoffs in WCCC.) >>Hiarcs ran on less than 25% of the CPU power and Hiarcs didn't drop a single >>game to Crafty in the tournament. > >I wasn't being or trying to be disrespectful. But you didn't beat Crafty in the >tournament. That's not rude, it's just a fact. > >>I said it before CCT6 even began and will say it now -- 5+3 blitz to settle >>tie-breaks in a tournament is foolish, especially considering such statements as >>above get made. > >Agreed. But HIARCS had its chance to beat Crafty and win. And it didn't. >Again, just facts. Just pick better facts when trying to prove your basis of why Crafty has good chances at WCCC. Winning a blitz playoff is not one of those supporting facts. It's overall 7/9 performance in CCT6 is, however. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.