Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 06:42:49 05/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2004 at 03:47:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 27, 2004 at 20:21:26, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 27, 2004 at 20:18:39, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On May 27, 2004 at 18:39:37, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On May 27, 2004 at 18:13:17, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 27, 2004 at 17:43:37, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 27, 2004 at 17:27:00, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>><snipped> >>>>>>>No, I dont see any relation as always. Maybe you join know with your Movei >>>>>>>Topic. What is the relevance? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Here are the words of Vincent: >>>>>> >>>>>>"This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he would do >>>>>>such a match. But he is not even 1% sure." >>>>>> >>>>>>Here is my reply: >>>>>> >>>>>>"No >>>>>> >>>>>>hyatt refuse to bet for money as a principle. >>>>>>It is clear that you throw the bet idea only to avoid the match." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If you fail to see the relation between vincent's words and my reply then I >>>>>>cannot help you. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>What is this? An Ionesco's score? What are you talking about? >>>>> >>>>>You initial delclation was: "Vincent suggested matche that will never happen >>>>>because he wants money for it. I responded and suggested a match that can >>>>>happen. The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a >>>>>relevant topic." >>>>> >>>>>Question: What is the relevance of your topic? It is boring and useless. >>>> >>>>It is in link >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367484 >>>> >>>>You said that you do not see the relation in reply to >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?367499 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>explanation of the relation in the first link(367484): >>>> >>>>Here are the relevant words in that link >>>> >>>>"> >>>>>3) A topic is posted and he begins a lot of irrelevant details of your thing >>>>>called Movie or Movei..... such as some famous topic of the wonderful opening >>>>>with 1. f3!! ;) >>>> >>>>Vincent suggested match that will never happen because he wants money for it. >>>>I responded and suggested a match that can happen. >>>> >>>>The topic started as irrelevant topic and I wanted to change it to a relevant >>>>topic. >>>> >>>>Uri" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>The relation is that I thought that you meant to the topic of the match >>>>Diep-Crafty in 3. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Well, your behavior as a third part is not logic either. I suggest you one thing >>>and Hyatt too: Show at the WCC 2004 and try to do the best. >>> >>>Instead of changing a topic for anoter nasty topic, show your capacities there. >>>That is my point. Mentioning the same Match, again and again, show one thing: >>>that you are dedicated in creating long absurd threads in this Forum instead >>>working for WCC or you already know that you are not able to improve your >>>engine. >>> >>>Such topic of the match is old, useless and a waste of time. If your mind can >>>only produce such replies, go ahead but I will close this mess Forum for another >>>6 months. Already in ICT4, the Diep book preparation was quite good. Thus, that >>>is not my intention to continue wasting my expensive time in trying to reach >>>your understanding. >>> >>>Good luck and continue creating craps here! Congrats. >> >>Additionally, what is your category? >> >>The Swami one? The Jorge Pichard one? The egostistic one? The stubborn one? >> >>They are unique profiles. You should reveal what your profile is. > >I do not think that it is very important but I gave some details in my profile. > >Uri it is not relevant your topic either.
This page took 0.21 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.