Author: Frank E. Oldham
Date: 11:23:09 05/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2004 at 13:47:28, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 29, 2004 at 11:21:02, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 29, 2004 at 05:18:08, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On May 28, 2004 at 20:37:11, Frank E. Oldham wrote: >>> >>>>On May 28, 2004 at 18:25:40, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 28, 2004 at 18:05:16, Frank E. Oldham wrote: >>>>>> time=77:56 cpu=390% mat=0 n=10705561160 fh=91% nps=2.29M >>>>>> >>>>>>Frank >>>>> >>>>>That a dual with HTing or a true quad? What speed are the CPUs? >>>> >>>>Neither :-) >>>>It's a dual G5 @ 2GHz; >>>>crafty has a bug where it doesn't count up thread times correctly on Solaris or >>>>Mac OS X (and perhaps on any BSD-derived os) -- Bob indicated that he'll try to >>>>fix it sometime. >>>>The biggest performance problem is the crappy gcc compiler :-( >>>>Frank >>> >>>G5? So is it 32 or 64 bit? >> >> >>64 > >So a single AMD FX53 in 64-bit is faster than a dual G5. Wow. That compiler >must be trash. As an example, even though the G5 (IBM 970) has 32 64-bit general registers, gcc refuses to pass a bitboard in a register -- it decomposes it into two 32-bit pieces, and uses two registers to pass them... it won't inline worth squat either Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.