Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 06:47:28 05/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2004 at 00:52:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 29, 2004 at 09:43:47, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On May 28, 2004 at 08:28:24, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>> >>>>>>>Vincent suggested matche that will never happen because he wants money for it. >>>>>>>I responded and suggested a match that can happen. >>>>>> >>>>>>This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he would do such >>>>>>a match. But he is not even 1% sure. >>>>> >>>>>No >>>>> >>>>>hyatt refuse to bet for money as a principle. >>>>>It is clear that you throw the bet idea only to avoid the match. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>I dont see the relation of this declaration with all the topic of this thread. >>>>Can you clarify what you are talking about? >>> >>>Looks pretty clear to me. >>> >>> Albert >> >> >>What is the relevance and the relation? I dont see it. Explain it. > >Are you intentionally being obtuse or just stupid? > The level of words that you use here will be the level of words that I will use with you in the future. By the way, the topic is so nasty that I dont understand why people continue citing and mentioning it. I would re-ask you or the Blass person or any similar person: To be citing the topic or your personal battle with Vincent is also intentionally stupid. >Vincent said "This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he >would do such a match. But he is not even 1% sure." > >That is complete bullshit. He has previously said that I would not attend a >wccc because I didn't think I had a chance. Now Crafty's coming. Be >interesting to see how he retracts his statement. I have never said anything of this. As I told you 1 million times. All this garbage between you and Vincent is irrelevant for me. That´s great that you join WCC2004 because it is a shame, seeing Crafty as a mere chess program in a FTP Folder. > >Uri pointed out "hyatt refuse to bet for money as a principle. It is clear that >you throw the bet idea only to avoid the match." That is _exactly_ what I told >Vincent. I'll play him any time. Any day. Any time control. But I don't bet >on chess games, particularly with someone as dishonest as he is... If you can't >see Uri's "relevance" to what Vincent posted, you have a _real_ problem... > >Vincent is the one that continually changes the topic when he loses on one angle >of attack. Not Uri. Not me... > My position as I have told him several times (but Uri only reads his messages) that the best place to face two engines is in official Tournaments in order to kill any polemic. However, neither you or Uri read that. >You have been hanging around Vincent too long. It appears to have had a >negative influence on you... I would say that to be hanging around this Forum has a letal effect in the people and it seems you are not safed. That is the reason why I read more the Winboard Forum and not this one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.