Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 12:11:10 05/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2004 at 14:58:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: New game r2q1rk1/pp1bbppp/2n1pn2/3p4/2PP4/1P1B1N2/PB1N1PPP/2RQ1RK1 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Shredder 8: 1. ² (0.28): 1...Nh5 2.Re1 Nf4 3.Bb1 Qa5 4.Qc2 g6 5.Qc3 Qxc3 6.Rxc3 Bb4 7.Rce3 Ba5 2. ² (0.47): 1...Qa5 2.a3 dxc4 3.bxc4 Rad8 4.Qb3 Qh5 5.Rfe1 Na5 6.Qc2 Nc6 7.Ne4 Ng4 8.Ng3 (Pichard, MyTown 30.05.2004) >Kasparov-Deep Blue >Philadelphia (6) 1996 > > >The Opening has been a sucess for Kasparov. He has good central control, and >prospects of a gradual queenside advance. More importantly, there is no direct >plan for Black, so Deep Blue drifts for a few moves with disastrous >consequences. The bishop is already a little clumpsy on d7; I suspect a strong >human player would have sunk into thought, and devised a plan for deliverating >his game. > >[D]r2q1rk1/pp1bbppp/2n1pn2/3p4/2PP4/1P1B1N2/PB1N1PPP/2RQ1RK1 b - - 0 1 > >11...Nh5? >This over-ambitious idea met with strong disapproval from most strong human >commentators. However, Yasser Seirawan said "oddly enough, one well-known chess >computer scientist suggested that the move may well be OK, but it might need a >highly advandce program and computer in a few years' time to justify this move". >I suspect that this is a case in point of someone believing that a strong >chess-playing program is doing something profound, when in fact is just >crunching numbers, Few GMs back in 1996 felt that 11....Nh5 was anything other >than a bad move.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.