Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:54:23 05/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2004 at 15:11:10, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 30, 2004 at 14:58:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: > > >New game >r2q1rk1/pp1bbppp/2n1pn2/3p4/2PP4/1P1B1N2/PB1N1PPP/2RQ1RK1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 8: > >1. ² (0.28): 1...Nh5 2.Re1 Nf4 3.Bb1 Qa5 4.Qc2 g6 5.Qc3 Qxc3 6.Rxc3 Bb4 7.Rce3 >Ba5 >2. ² (0.47): 1...Qa5 2.a3 dxc4 3.bxc4 Rad8 4.Qb3 Qh5 5.Rfe1 Na5 6.Qc2 Nc6 7.Ne4 >Ng4 8.Ng3 So Shredder says it is .19 worse than Qa5, which _also_ looks a bit suspect... I'm not sure what this proves, if anything. I personally like Nh5 better than Qa5... As black I'd like to start something on the king-side. Whether it is f6 and e5 or f5 directly doesn't matter as the knight has to get out of the way first anyway... > >(Pichard, MyTown 30.05.2004) > > >>Kasparov-Deep Blue >>Philadelphia (6) 1996 >> >> >>The Opening has been a sucess for Kasparov. He has good central control, and >>prospects of a gradual queenside advance. More importantly, there is no direct >>plan for Black, so Deep Blue drifts for a few moves with disastrous >>consequences. The bishop is already a little clumpsy on d7; I suspect a strong >>human player would have sunk into thought, and devised a plan for deliverating >>his game. >> >>[D]r2q1rk1/pp1bbppp/2n1pn2/3p4/2PP4/1P1B1N2/PB1N1PPP/2RQ1RK1 b - - 0 1 >> >>11...Nh5? >>This over-ambitious idea met with strong disapproval from most strong human >>commentators. However, Yasser Seirawan said "oddly enough, one well-known chess >>computer scientist suggested that the move may well be OK, but it might need a >>highly advandce program and computer in a few years' time to justify this move". >>I suspect that this is a case in point of someone believing that a strong >>chess-playing program is doing something profound, when in fact is just >>crunching numbers, Few GMs back in 1996 felt that 11....Nh5 was anything other >>than a bad move.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.