Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:58:01 05/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 30, 2004 at 11:54:57, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On May 30, 2004 at 10:51:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 30, 2004 at 09:47:28, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On May 30, 2004 at 00:52:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On May 29, 2004 at 09:43:47, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 28, 2004 at 08:28:24, Albert Silver wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Vincent suggested matche that will never happen because he wants money for it. >>>>>>>>>>I responded and suggested a match that can happen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>This is not true. If hyatt would be just 51% sure he would win, he would do such >>>>>>>>>a match. But he is not even 1% sure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>No >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>hyatt refuse to bet for money as a principle. >>>>>>>>It is clear that you throw the bet idea only to avoid the match. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I dont see the relation of this declaration with all the topic of this thread. >>>>>>>Can you clarify what you are talking about? >>>>>> >>>>>>Looks pretty clear to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Albert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>What is the relevance and the relation? I dont see it. Explain it. >>>> >>>>Are you intentionally being obtuse or just stupid? >>>> >>> >>>The level of words that you use here will be the level of words that I will use >>>with you in the future. By the way, the topic is so nasty that I dont understand >>>why people continue citing and mentioning it. >> >>Because _you_ keep accusing Uri of posting something _unrelated_. He posted a >>_direct_ response to Vincent. You said you don't see how his post is related to >>what he followed up on. I don't see how that is possible and I _quoted_ the >>post by vincent, and the follow-up by Uri. His response was _directly_ related >>to the post by Vincent. >> >>It almost appears that you don't read the entire post. As even Albert said "it >>is obvious"... >> >> >>> >>>I would re-ask you or the Blass person or any similar person: To be citing the >>>topic or your personal battle with Vincent is also intentionally stupid. >> >>Why did _you_ jump into their discussion, and accuse Uri of posting an >>off-thread reply? He replied _directly_ to Vincent. Why didnt you accuse >>Vincent of doing that since _he_ always changes the subject. This thread had >>_nothing_ about that stupid bet idea of his until he introduced it. And you >>didn't think that was off topic... >> > >The answer is easy. You should be very clear. My problem is not with you or >Vincent Diepeveen or your personal battle. Let´s be clear. > >My problem is how Blass introduce himself in several topics. As you and Vincent >has personal problems, Blass is not my favorite chess programmer. I do not understand your problem. I think that it is better if you try to be more polite in discussions. > >While your attitude doesnt destroy the essense of this Forum, Blass with another >"wonderful profiles" such as Jorge Pichard, Swami and other egostistic ones only >produce polemics, dry discussions and other stupid topics. I do not understand what is your problem with my profile? > >That is my personal opinion: While in the Winboard Forum is better moderated, >there are a lot of nonsense of topic in this Forum. Moderator doesnt have a >clear position of some messages posted by this "wonderful" posters. > >The negativeness of Blass is so insane that my level of tolerance went off some >months ago with him directly and other people here. I do not see what you are talking about. > >While I can keep healthy debate with your person, it is impossible to debate any >topic with Blas-Blahh. As he jumped in this topic with a mixture of your the >most boring battle of the century. I jumped to stop all the nonsense. If something is boring for you then you do not have to respond in that subject but if a subject is about computer chess and not about personal attacks then you have no reason to complain. > >While I waste some minutes of my expensive time (typical egostistic way to say >the things in this Forum), other people is watching the F1 Competition. > >My position is: This topic Hyatt-Diepeveen _____SHOULD BE____ banned of the >Forum. Period. > >Isnt it ___CLEAR___? I did not start that topic so why do you blame me. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.