Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:38:32 06/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 2004 at 12:13:27, Dan Ellwein wrote: >On May 31, 2004 at 10:54:41, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 31, 2004 at 10:37:05, Rob Basham wrote: >> >>>Offset.....settings >>> >>>Attack/Defend -40 >>> >>>Strength of play 100 >>>Material/Positional 0 >>>Random 0 >>>Max. search depth 99 >>>Selective search 12 >>>contemp draw 0.0 >>> >>>Center.........................85 >>>center/ opp. 85 >>> >>>queen 7.1 >>>....opp. 7.0 >>> >>>rook 4.1 >>>.....opp 4.0 >>> >>>bishop 2.2 >>>......opp 2.1 >>> >>>pawn......1.0 >>>opp.........1.0 >>> >>>everything else appears to be the same,,, >>>regards >>>Rob >> >>Bishop is only 2.1 or 2.2 pawns? >>It seems clear that it cannot do well in games relative to other personalities. > >yes, Uri, you are right... > >these settings are for analyzing positions only If setting are for analyze position then they should be also productive for games. analyzing positions is when you do not know that if there is a good move that is hard to find. If a setting helps in cases that you know that there is a combination but is counter productive in cases that there is no combination then I am not going to prefer them for analyzing because there is a better chance that they are going to help me to waste time about a wrong sacrifise. The setting can be good to solve test positions but analyze position is not solving test positions. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.