Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:35:40 06/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2004 at 16:28:33, Robert Allgeuer wrote: >On June 03, 2004 at 15:32:14, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On June 03, 2004 at 14:48:55, Robert Allgeuer wrote: >> >>> >>>In the following endgame position Crafty 19.13 (I have tried both the compiles >>>by Slater Wold and Dann Corbit) analyses this as a draw with score 0.00. Crafty >>>19.6 on the other hand correctly detects the mate in one. >>> >>>Winboard, hash 96 Mb, Athlon 2400+, all 5 piece EGTBs installed. >>> >>>[d]8/6P1/8/8/2b5/8/p1k2p2/K7 b - - 0 90 >>> >>>Robert >> >>Hi Robert, which dates have your versions? >>Even if you had tried both named compiled ones, it's still >>possible that those are first releases of Crafty 19.13, >>which had a tablebase bug. >> >>Günther > >I am aware that there was this bug and consequently 2 different 19.13 versions, >therefore I downloaded after that, so I am pretty sure I have the corrected >version. >The compile of Slater Wold has been downloaded on 13.5.2004, the one from Dann >Corbit just a week ago. >Can anybody reproduce the result (with 5 piece EGTBs) or does Crafty 19.13 >detect a mate for everybody else and it is a problem just on my machine? Corrupt >EGTBs cannot be the reason, because 19.6 uses exactly the same EGTB files. > >Robert I can not reproduce this. I ran with 6=piece tables. mate in 1. With only 5 piece tables, mate in 1. With _no_ tables. Mate in 1.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.