Author: Slater Wold
Date: 14:42:13 06/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2004 at 17:04:37, Peter Berger wrote: >On June 03, 2004 at 16:28:33, Robert Allgeuer wrote: > >>On June 03, 2004 at 15:32:14, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On June 03, 2004 at 14:48:55, Robert Allgeuer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>In the following endgame position Crafty 19.13 (I have tried both the compiles >>>>by Slater Wold and Dann Corbit) analyses this as a draw with score 0.00. Crafty >>>>19.6 on the other hand correctly detects the mate in one. >>>> >>>>Winboard, hash 96 Mb, Athlon 2400+, all 5 piece EGTBs installed. >>>> >>>>[d]8/6P1/8/8/2b5/8/p1k2p2/K7 b - - 0 90 >>>> >>>>Robert >>> >>>Hi Robert, which dates have your versions? >>>Even if you had tried both named compiled ones, it's still >>>possible that those are first releases of Crafty 19.13, >>>which had a tablebase bug. >>> >>>Günther >> >>I am aware that there was this bug and consequently 2 different 19.13 versions, >>therefore I downloaded after that, so I am pretty sure I have the corrected >>version. >>The compile of Slater Wold has been downloaded on 13.5.2004, the one from Dann >>Corbit just a week ago. >>Can anybody reproduce the result (with 5 piece EGTBs) or does Crafty 19.13 >>detect a mate for everybody else and it is a problem just on my machine? Corrupt >>EGTBs cannot be the reason, because 19.6 uses exactly the same EGTB files. >> >>Robert > >I think there might indeed be a bug here, but it is probably crucial to have >your exact commands to work things out IMHO. > >Although I can't reproduce your actual problem, I can manage to get some >unexpected/strange output in case Crafty is about to deliver a mate in one with >"analyze". > >Could you post your crafty.rc and any input you entered before feeding the >position to Crafty ? > >Peter Better yet, the entire log...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.