Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:35:26 06/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2004 at 08:13:39, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On June 05, 2004 at 07:44:19, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On June 04, 2004 at 18:39:13, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>> >>>Since computer can hold and remember more Opening than any Human and they are at >>>the level of the very best human players such as Kasparov, Anand and Kramnik' >>>the need for Fischer Random Chess will become more popular in the next 5 years. >>>Even a player such as former world champion Garry Kasparov who has incredible >>>memorization capabilities, complained that he could not always remember his >>>opening preparation. Therefore, it will become justifiable to match the very >>>best human against the very vest FRC program. Probably very soon Shredder and >>>Hiarcs will also be available in FRC. >>> >>>PS: There is no human brain that can compete with the mass storage device >>>available for current PC. >>> >>>http://www.geocities.com/MIGHTORS1/Leko/Fischerandom1.html >> >>my guess is that humans can't compete with the best eingines in FRC, since they >>loose their ability to choose the opening they know best and prepared plus >>certain patterns may be wrong in FRC. >> >>regards Joachim > >Those engines who can play FRC are relatively weak and Peter Svidler for example >would kill them easily. > >Just my 2 cents > >Michael relatively to what? I have no knowledge how much time did peter Svidler spent on FRC. As it seems that no programmer spent serious effort on FRC the real test is between the best humans at classical chess and the best computer at classical chess when the king and rooks are in the original places and you only can replace places of queen bishops and knights. Do you expect the top humans in classical chess that have no significant experience in FRC to perform better relative to shredder when you compare it with their result in classical chess. I suspect that the answer is negative and they will be relativelyy better in classical chess. I suspect that for the top humans the existence of theory in classical chess is an advantage because theory is not only about moves but about plans to think about when in FRC they may get positions that they never get in regular chess so they will not know what to do. I am interested to know how many GM's wasted significant time on FRC(I guess that more than 90% of the GM's have no experience that improve their level in FRC). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.