Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: weak engines?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:13:53 06/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 05, 2004 at 09:54:55, Marc wrote:

>Maybe a bit off topic here ...
>
>Of course it is nice to watch a much too strong engine to wipe you of the board,
>over and over again. But eventually this gets a bit boring.
>So I wonder, has anybody programmed an engine which is not really strong, but
>fun to play against? (about ELO 1700-1900)
>
>Crippling a strong engine is somewhat dissatisfying, for some reason.

The problem is not in the engines but in the hardware that you have.
It is too fast.

It is only the hardware that make the impression that engines are better than
1900.

You should ask for hardware that is 10000 times slower than the hardware that
you have.

The real smart people are not the programmers but the people who build hardware
that is faster every year and I have no idea how they do it.

The fact that it seems to me that most of the progress in the last 30 years were
done thanks to better hardware and not thanks to better software suggest that
we(the programmers) are relatively stupid.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.