Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's the best architecture?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:29:24 06/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 05, 2004 at 15:24:32, William Bryant wrote:

>On June 04, 2004 at 22:49:21, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On June 04, 2004 at 22:38:59, Joshua Shriver wrote:
>>
>>>As I embark on a new adventure as a chess engine developer I wonder what is the
>>>best architecture to develope for?
>>>
>>>Keeping in mind I'd like to write assembly cores but C overall?
>>>While I've been a long Alpha fan.. right now it seems the best cores are Opteron
>>>and G5's.
>>>
>>>Any comments are appreciated.
>>>
>>>Sincerely,
>>>Joshua Shriver
>>
>>
>>Opterons and alphas are great.  Opteron is already significantly faster,
>>however, and the gap will continue to widen as alpha development seems to have
>>slowed way down since the rights were sold by DEC a few years back.
>>
>>Opteron looks like the chip of the future, although Intel has announced an
>>X86-64 processor for their future, scheduled for early next year.  How it will
>>perform given the opteron will be 2 years old is a question to be answered once
>>it is actually delivered...
>
>Any comments about the performance of IBM's G5 processor.
>
>A dual G5 with a FSB of 1GHz sounds competitive, and the price is similar to
>what people have quoted for build-your-own opteron systems on this board.
>
>Wm


The processors look good, but I have not personally had access to anything
recent from IBM that uses this processor, so I can't comment.  Someone posted
reasonable crafty nps numbers for a G5 within the past week or two however, for
a reference point...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.