Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 02:51:09 06/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2004 at 05:12:33, Tord Romstad wrote: >On June 07, 2004 at 04:37:54, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>P.S.: I don't think Gothmog would qualify for that rating list. If Gothmog >>would, Fruit definitely would too - and that I can't believe. By the way, do you >>thin Fruit 1.5 is stronger than Gothmog? I don't know since I never tested Fruit 1.5, but starting today I will test Fruit 1.5 using Stefan Pohl 15 FRC-PGN positions under Shredder 8 GUI. I will start testing Fruit 1.5 vs Gothmog 1.0 b2:-) Jorge >Yes, I think so (though I don't yet have enough data to be 100% sure). And more >importantly, Fruit is a new and rapidly improving engine, while Gothmog is >essentially dead and will not see much more development in the future (I hope >the >next public version will be the last one). > >There are many engines which deserve testing much more than Gothmog at the >moment. >Fruit is definitely one of them. > >Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.