Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 08:27:25 06/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2004 at 11:08:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 07, 2004 at 11:01:51, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On June 07, 2004 at 10:46:28, Uri Blass wrote: >>>A smart compiler should understand that 1<<36 cannot mean 0 because in that case >>>the programmer has no reason to write it in that way. >> >>Of course a programmer might have a reason to write it that way. > >He may write 1<<i when i may be 36 in part of the cases but I see no reason to >write 1<<36 and not 0. What people often tend to forget is that not only people write programs. Programs write programs, too. :-) Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.