Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 11:40:36 06/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2004 at 05:12:33, Tord Romstad wrote: >On June 07, 2004 at 04:37:54, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>P.S.: I don't think Gothmog would qualify for that rating list. If Gothmog >>would, Fruit definitely would too - and that I can't believe. By the way, do you >>thin Fruit 1.5 is stronger than Gothmog? > >Yes, I think so (though I don't yet have enough data to be 100% sure). And more >importantly, Fruit is a new and rapidly improving engine, while Gothmog is >essentially dead and will not see much more development in the future (I hope >the >next public version will be the last one). > >There are many engines which deserve testing much more than Gothmog at the >moment. >Fruit is definitely one of them. > >Tord Perhaps testing with Gothmog is more fun, since Gothmog has a very attractive and entertaining playing style. You admitted that you stick to this aggressive style even though you know, that with some tuning you could achieve higer playing style, so it's your design decision. You clearly have reached your goal to create a good _and_ entertaining engine. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.