Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:25:45 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote: >On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications >>show it to be a tad faster. Will do some bench marking! >> >>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7? >> >>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12.. >> >>Chris > > >The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will >peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+ >costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than >an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the >near future: > >http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm Thanks for the link. I am surprised by the good results of the new pIV because I learned here that the PIV is bad for chess and it catches the 3th place in the list. I thought that the PIV is generasted for floating points numbers and not for chess. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.