Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: probably yes, but slower than an AMD 64 3000+

Author: Bryan Hofmann

Date: 05:47:36 06/08/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote:

>On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications
>>show it to be a tad faster.  Will do some bench marking!
>>
>>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7?
>>
>>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12..
>>
>>Chris
>
>
>The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will
>peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+
>costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than
>an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the
>near future:
>
>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm

My standard non-overclocked XP 3000+ is at 2171 Mhz and I see no performance
results on this page that indicate that the C 1.7 is faster than the XP 3000+.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.