Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 10:19:51 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 08:47:36, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote: >> >>>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications >>>show it to be a tad faster. Will do some bench marking! >>> >>>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7? >>> >>>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12.. >>> >>>Chris >> >> >>The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will >>peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+ >>costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than >>an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the >>near future: >> >>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm > >My standard non-overclocked XP 3000+ is at 2171 Mhz and I see no performance >results on this page that indicate that the C 1.7 is faster than the XP 3000+. than you have the "old" XP 3000+ the one with higher MHz and slower FSB. Nevertheless for Fritz the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz should be a bit faster than your 3000+ Centrino 1.7 GHz 1166 KN/s Norbert Baumann AMD XP 2700+/2167 1080 kN/s Michael42 regards Joachim P.S.: Do yoo owe Fritz 8? It would be interesting if you could run a Fritzmark
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.