Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 10:22:01 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 08:25:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote: >> >>>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications >>>show it to be a tad faster. Will do some bench marking! >>> >>>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7? >>> >>>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12.. >>> >>>Chris >> >> >>The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will >>peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+ >>costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than >>an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the >>near future: >> >>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm > >Thanks for the link. >I am surprised by the good results of the new pIV because I learned here that >the PIV is bad for chess and it catches the 3th place in the list. > >I thought that the PIV is generasted for floating points numbers and not for >chess. > >Uri that is an overclocked one which run wiht 3.7 GHz. As you see the P4 with 3.7 Ghz is still a bit slower than an AMD 64 with 2.2 Ghz. I call that inferior. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.