Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 11:33:13 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 14:07:02, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote: >> >>>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications >>>show it to be a tad faster. Will do some bench marking! >>> >>>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7? >>> >>>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12.. >>> >>>Chris >> >> >>The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will >>peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+ >>costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than >>an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the >>near future: >> >>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm > >Dothan is a well designed CPU. Not surprisingly it is much closer to the >opteron than the P4 :) Opteron still has a clear performance lead however, as a >2.4G opteron should get about 1500 knps v 1150 knps for the Centrino. > >The guy who overclocked his dual xeon system is nuts. > >anthony I read, there are already Pentium-M 2 GHz out. I'm notsure which one is faster Pentium-M 2.0 Ghz or Opteron 2.4 Ghz if they run in 32-Bit-Mode. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.