Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 13:04:31 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 15:47:23, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >On June 08, 2004 at 13:19:51, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On June 08, 2004 at 08:47:36, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >> >>>On June 08, 2004 at 08:11:54, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On June 08, 2004 at 06:36:37, Chris Taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>Have not had time to fully experiment with the thing yet, but early indications >>>>>show it to be a tad faster. Will do some bench marking! >>>>> >>>>>Any one had any good reports with the C 1.7? >>>>> >>>>>I would like to squeeze some more nps for Crafty, and Rebel 12.. >>>>> >>>>>Chris >>>> >>>> >>>>The Athlon XP 3000+ is clocked with 2100 MHz and according to this page it will >>>>peform worse than the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz, but don't forget the Athlon XP 3000+ >>>>costs half the price of C 1.7. An AMD 64 3000+ which is still much cheaper than >>>>an C 1.7 is even faster than C 1.7 and will gain from 64 Bit - Software in the >>>>near future: >>>> >>>>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/chessmarks.htm >>> >>>My standard non-overclocked XP 3000+ is at 2171 Mhz and I see no performance >>>results on this page that indicate that the C 1.7 is faster than the XP 3000+. >> >> >>than you have the "old" XP 3000+ the one with higher MHz and slower FSB. >>Nevertheless for Fritz the Pentium - M 1.7 Ghz should be a bit faster than your >>3000+ > >No it is not old and the FSB is 166/333 same as the other XPs except the 3200+ >which has 200/400 FSB. > > >> >>Centrino 1.7 GHz 1166 KN/s Norbert Baumann >> >>AMD XP 2700+/2167 1080 kN/s Michael42 >> > >There is no such animal as a XP 2700+, They only made XP 2500+, XP 2800+ XP >3000+ and XP 3200+. One of the biggest differences in the XP is that it has >twice the L2 cache (512KB) of the Thoroughbred-B core (256KB). So the above >comparison of using this Thoroughbred-B 2700+ is not the same as a XP3000+. AMD did infact make an Athlon XP 2700+. It came as the 2166.6MHz 256k L2, 1.65v, 166fsb(333DDR) core. Model 8. Here is the AMD tech doc with the 2700+ processor specifications: http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25175.pdf My personal favorite for chess (non-overclocked XP) would be the 2800+. It was 2.25GHz, 166/333ddr, had 256k L2 and faster than any other XP chip. As far as overclocking goes.. slap in a 2600+ mobile (works in regular boards) and push it up to 2.6-2.7GHz for $100. :) They work in dual configuration, too. >>regards Joachim >> >>P.S.: Do yoo owe Fritz 8? It would be interesting if you could run a Fritzmark > >Don't have any commercial engines. As far as benchmarking goes with something >like a chess engine it is really going to depend on how it was compiled and what >CPU it is optimzed for. Most commercial programs tend to favor Intel based CPUs >for marketing reasons.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.