Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 17:44:15 06/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 2004 at 17:16:11, Derek Winter wrote: >For slow, overnight analysis, I have been using Fritz8 "Deep Position Analysis" >for a long time but have never used the BlunderCheck. > >Is there a way to use Blundercheck to supplement the Deep Position Analysis, and >if so, what would be good parameters to use for the BlunderCheck? > > Thanks, Derek The DPA gives a tree starting from one position. It is said to be used primarily by CC chess players. You can't quite compare it to blundercheck. Blundercheck will check every move played, but will not analyse its own alternatives off the root. Set the blundercheck to a high time amount per move and a low threshold and you'll get an indepth analysis of every move in the game. Good parameters are the parameters that fit your goal. Do you want a quick assessment of the blunders from you: choose only to analyse your own side, choose a high treshold (tactical blunder) and not too much time per move. You want to see the possibilities of every move? Set to analyse all, a low threshold (under 0.20) and a lot of time per move. Be prepared for an >24 hour analysis. J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.