Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 12:01:05 06/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2004 at 03:54:25, Mark Winands wrote: >Below we recall a few decisions from the Maastricht Triennial Meeting in 2002. >There the ICGA was established and it was decided that a WCCC should be held >annually. The observation was clear: all kinds of differences between >microcomputers, personal computers, “normal” computers, and supercomputers >were in some sense obsolete and the classification thus was considered >artificial. So was the division into the classes of single processors and >multiprocessors. Even the distinction between amateur and professional was at >stake. Is not the real amateur a professional? Or the other way round? I have found this paragraph to be a semanticist's delight. Those who would like to relax and laugh a little will surely find it very "agreeable".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.