Author: Derek Paquette
Date: 17:17:35 06/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2004 at 19:59:53, Andrei P wrote: >On June 09, 2004 at 19:35:47, Derek Paquette wrote: > >>On June 09, 2004 at 19:28:53, Andrei P wrote: >> >>>On June 09, 2004 at 18:49:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Taking on a 3400+ AMD 64 with 2 GB RAM and Fritz 8 >>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1703 >>> >>>well, supposedly the game could have been a draw. it was all up to her to take >>>it or to continue. if she has played mostly female players she might be 100 elo >>>underated. that makes it a draw against 2600 -> not that impressive. but we need >>>many more games for any meaningful statistics. and we are not gonna get those >>>anyways... >> >>better than a loss, >>we've seen 2700 FIDE males lose to 2500 elo males, >>so the program is doing better than that, >>and its not even the best program, > > >yes, but on this laptop with fritz 8 should rate 2900 points and beat Zhu Chen >most of the time and we are talking equal game here. makes me wonder if ssdf is >200-300 overated, but, again, it is just one game. Not sure how you are making that assertion, on ICC i *think* that Blarg is the fastest machine right now, not too long ago his rating was shown, and i think in classical time control he only lost 6% of his games i would LOVE to know how many times he's beaten a human.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.