Author: Andrei P
Date: 17:57:22 06/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2004 at 20:17:35, Derek Paquette wrote: >On June 09, 2004 at 19:59:53, Andrei P wrote: > >>On June 09, 2004 at 19:35:47, Derek Paquette wrote: >> >>>On June 09, 2004 at 19:28:53, Andrei P wrote: >>> >>>>On June 09, 2004 at 18:49:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>Taking on a 3400+ AMD 64 with 2 GB RAM and Fritz 8 >>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1703 >>>> >>>>well, supposedly the game could have been a draw. it was all up to her to take >>>>it or to continue. if she has played mostly female players she might be 100 elo >>>>underated. that makes it a draw against 2600 -> not that impressive. but we need >>>>many more games for any meaningful statistics. and we are not gonna get those >>>>anyways... >>> >>>better than a loss, >>>we've seen 2700 FIDE males lose to 2500 elo males, >>>so the program is doing better than that, >>>and its not even the best program, >> >> >>yes, but on this laptop with fritz 8 should rate 2900 points and beat Zhu Chen >>most of the time and we are talking equal game here. makes me wonder if ssdf is >>200-300 overated, but, again, it is just one game. > >Not sure how you are making that assertion, >on ICC i *think* that Blarg is the fastest machine right now, not too long ago >his rating was shown, and i think in classical time control he only lost 6% of >his games >i would LOVE to know how many times he's beaten a human. I don't trust icc ratings they are inflated and can't be compared to fide rating. also, the time control in standard is typically 15 min on icc. and computers have been known for 5 years to be better at this time control then the top humans. but that is not "real" chess. ssdf is much better rating because the time control is >2hr, all they need is to recalibrate the scale
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.