Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: This Super Laptop with Fritz 8 would even beat Judith Polgar!

Author: Derek Paquette

Date: 18:00:16 06/09/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 09, 2004 at 20:56:50, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On June 09, 2004 at 20:44:21, Derek Paquette wrote:
>
>>On June 09, 2004 at 20:29:43, Derek Paquette wrote:
>>
>>>On June 09, 2004 at 20:24:52, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 09, 2004 at 19:27:37, Derek Paquette wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 09, 2004 at 19:23:11, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 09, 2004 at 19:07:39, Derek Paquette wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On June 09, 2004 at 18:49:40, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Taking on a 3400+ AMD 64 with 2 GB RAM and Fritz 8
>>>>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1703
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>this is very annoying for someone who is a chess enthusiast like myself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>why would the company that is marketting this laptop, RISK using a program that
>>>>>>>is 40 elo LOWER?
>>>>>>>i just dont' get it,
>>>>>>>i think it comes down to plain old ignorance of chess programs
>>>>>>>why NOT use shredder 8?
>>>>>>>this is very frusterating, because we never get to see shredder 8 in action vs
>>>>>>>grandmasters at tournament time controls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Probably, they have a good reason.
>>>>>>For instance, they might take 7.04 and analyze every game she has every played
>>>>>>at very slow time control.  Now, they have a database and expected response for
>>>>>>most of the moves she is likely to make.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps the analysis started long ago.  They know for sure exactly how it would
>>>>>>work with 7.04
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Bleeding edge is not always the best thing, if you want a reliable outcome.
>>>>>>For the same reason, we won't always see the fastest possible hardware.  It
>>>>>>could be that the fastest stuff has not been tested.  It would be a mistake to
>>>>>>try an untested system.
>>>>>
>>>>>that is very true, if shredder 8 was released last week, HOWEVER,
>>>>>shredder 8 has been released long enough for the following to happen,
>>>>>SSDF has had enough time to test it
>>>>>ICC is full of shredder 8 (and it turning humans into mince meat)
>>>>>
>>>>>that is enough to say that the program is well tested, and that it would kick
>>>>>the crap out of a human, because its certainly beating around fritz 8.
>>>>
>>>>It it not known whether Fritz 8 would do better against humans than Shredder 8.
>>>>
>>>>We might surmise it from SSDF and WMCCC results, but that is really an
>>>>extrapolation that may not be correct.
>>>>
>>>>At any rate, even the SSDF Elo strength rating also does not decide who is
>>>>stronger:
>>>>
>>>>      THE SSDF RATING LIST 2004-04-22   97872 games played by  264 computers
>>>>                                           Rating   +     -  Games   Won  Oppo
>>>>                                           ------  ---   --- -----   ---  ----
>>>>   1 Shredder 8.0 CB  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz  2818   34   -32   481   70%  2673
>>>>   2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2809   24   -23   967   71%  2648
>>>>   3 Deep Fritz 8.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz   2790   26   -25   855   72%  2625
>>>>
>>>>2818 - 32 = 2786
>>>>2790 + 26 = 2816
>>>
>>>two things,
>>>1. it was fritz8, not df8
>>>2. it is only logical to surmise that s8 would do better vs humans as it's
>>>performance vs programs is higher,
>>>it is the only concrete proof we have, and so our only practical and ratinoal
>>>guess would be that s8 does aswell,
>>>anyting else would be coming out of thin air.
>>
>>
>>just to add to what i said, there is a 59 point elo difference between fritz 8
>>and Shredder 8 according to the SSDF, in my opinion it was foolhardy to actually
>>use fritz 8 instead of shredder 8,
>>
>>59 isn't small potatoes if you ask me, could be the difference between a draw
>>and a win.
>
>1.  It is less than the level of uncertainty, though Shredder is probably
>slightly stronger.
>
>2.  It is measured using computers against computers.  How does this translate
>to humans against humans?  Nobody knows.  Probably there is some kind of
>correlation but we do not know what it is (if any).
>
>There is no way for you to know which program will do better against humans.
>You are making an educated guess.

yes precisely based off the only knowledge we have, comp vs comp.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.